In the United States, the history ofemergency contraceptionhas sparkedcontroversy, ignited political debates and generated lawsuits. The heated nature of emergency contraception is due, in part, to whether or not people believe that the morning-after pill acts to prevent a pregnancy from occurring or whether it terminates a pregnancy that has already been established. Plan B One-Step (i.e., the morning-after pill) is often confused withRU486(i.e., the abortion pill). These two medications arenotthe same and each works entirely differently when it comes to the process of reproduction.

Gregory Smith/Getty Images

Pro-Choice Demonstration in Houston

It is well understood that medications used for emergency contraception do not cause abortions. There are rigorous studies showing that emergency contraceptives (Ella and Levonorgestrel regimens like Plan B) prevent ovulation and do not prevent implantation of a fertilized egg or an established pregnancy.

No matter what your personal beliefs are, the history of emergency contraception and its FDA-approval in the United States has been quite a volatile journey. The roots of modern emergency contraception can actually be traced back to animal studies in the 1920s, yet human use started in the 1960s. So buckle up, this may be a bumpy ride.

Timeline: History of Emergency Contraception

Fast Forward Two Decades

About 6 Months Later

The Plot Thickens in 2005

Whew… 2005 was pretty rough in the history of emergency contraception. What does the year 2006 have in store for the morning-after pill?

2006 Through 2013

Fast Forward 2 Years…

And the Saga Heats Up Again 3 Months Later…

2009 seemed to be a big year in emergency contraception history. Let’s move on ahead about one year later…

Now, Get Ready for 2011 (Sparks Ignite, Once Again)…

So, the year 2012 starts off with this court case where the plaintiffs file a motion for a preliminary ban that would allow OTC access for all levonorgestrel-based emergency contraceptives (both one and two-pill versions) without any age or point-of-sale restrictions…

And with this, we lead you into the year 2013 and the conclusion of the history of emergency contraception and its long and bumpy journey to get to where it is today…

Drum roll please… the moment in emergency contraception history that we have been leading up to—yes,it’sfinally here…

The history of emergency contraception includes significant victories and some defeats. In the end, the availability of this important contraceptive serves as one more tool in theprevention of unplanned pregnanciesand abortions.

16 Sources

Verywell Health uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read oureditorial processto learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.

Li HWR, Resche-Rigon M, Bagchi IC, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Glasier A.Does ulipristal acetate emergency contraception (ella) interfere with implantation?.Contraception. 2019;100(5):386-390. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.140

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Emergency contraception.

Wertheimer RE.Emergency postcoital contraception.Am Fam Physician. 2000;62(10):2287-2292.

Federal Register.Prescription drug products; Certain combined oral contraceptives for use as postcoital emergency contraception.

Food and Drug Administration.PREVEN emergency contraceptive kit consisting of emergency contraceptive pills and pregnancy test.

Planned Parenthood.Emergency contraception: history and access.

Government Accountability Office.Food and Drug Administration: decision process to deny initial application for over-the-counter marketing of the emergency contraceptive drug Plan B was unusual.

Kaufman M.FDA: Plan B sales rejected against advice. Official denies that politics blocked contraceptive’s over-the-counter status.Washington Post. May 7, 2004.

Weismiller DG.Emergency contraception.Am Fam Physician.2004;70(4):707-714.

Food and Drug Administration.Approval package for: APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 021998/S-002.

Casetext.Tummino v. Torti.

Center for Reproductive Rights.Federal judge orders FDA to broaden access to emergency contraception.

KFF.Emergency contraception.

Center for Reproductive Rights.Tummino v. Hamburg.

Weisberg DK.Chapter 8: Procreation. In:Family Law. 4th ed. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; 201.

Meet Our Medical Expert Board

Share Feedback

Was this page helpful?Thanks for your feedback!What is your feedback?OtherHelpfulReport an ErrorSubmit

Was this page helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!

What is your feedback?OtherHelpfulReport an ErrorSubmit

What is your feedback?